I totally agree that in conversations centered on transgendered experience, other queer folk should shut up and listen, and sometimes different portions of the trans umbrella when another parts are speaking. I could be wrong, and if you think so, please say, but my impression was that the conversation on PHB was an intra-queer discussion, and therefore a perfectly appropriate space for gay men to voice their concerns as well.

I'm a little confused on who your Us and Them are here. As far as feminine/femme passing privilege, I've got that in droves. And that is a very different privilege from masculine passing privilege. It's one of the frustrations I have with the use of the term heterosexual privilege, because heterosexual privilege for men and women is very, very different--the woman's being the privilege to be fully accepted as a second class citizen, which is a privilege over someone who doesn't even have that--but it really is a very different realm of privilege from male heterosexual privilege. My time spent in bi communities gave me a lot of food for thought over the variants there. And it's among my concerns with a blanket term like cisgender, which reduces a realm of experiences of gender into one term--in the ways I have most seen the term be used. I do think it's important to mark the unmarked--maybe I just need the term cisgender problematized more. I think gender identity is problematic for more people than not in a variety of ways, and a term like cisgender helps pave that over instead of opening it out.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

.

Profile

lavendertook: Cessy and Kimba (Default)
lavendertook

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags